If liberty and equality are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost. - Aristotle (384-322 BC)
Americans generally don’t vote much. Our voter turnout runs as low as half in a boring presidential election year and doesn’t even rise as high as two-thirds in an interesting one. In between those national elections, we’re lucky to get half the registered voters to cast a ballot, and we’ve dropped as low as one-third many places, many times.
In the 1960 presidential election, only 63 percent of the eligible voters in America actually did. When it comes to citizens exercising their civic duty, that’s the best we’ve done over the past fifty years.
We’re not alone. In the United Kingdom of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, voter turnout has dropped from 84 percent in 1950 to just 65 percent in 2010. Most of that decline has come during the last fifteen years.
Here in Oregon, we set a state record this year for the lowest ballot return ever in a presidential primary – a whopping 38 percent of the registered voters bothered to return a ballot that was mailed to them.
It was, in a sense, understandable. Republican and Libertarian challengers to the incumbent Democrat had already been chosen by the time voting season opened up here in the Northwest, so our primary votes were largely symbolic, a small gesture in the election process that didn’t really matter.
But there were other choices to be made on those ballots, decisions to be made at city, county and state levels that were decided by about one-third of the voters. That’s in a state where ballots arrive in mailboxes and can be returned for the price of a stamp, or dropped off for free in numerous locations.
There’s even a reasonable expectation that those ballots will be properly counted, which I find very encouraging these days.
Given how easy it is here, Oregon’s low rate of returns doesn’t bode well for states where you must go to a polling location, stand in line and use a not-so-state-of-the-art electronic machine to enter your vote into a digital system that is vulnerable to cyberhackers on every level.
If we want to actually live in a republic that governs by democracy, the more than 50 million citizens who are eligible to vote but don’t bother to register – many because they don’t like the choices available – need a reason to get in the game.
A winner-take-all system like ours doesn’t provide representation to everyone. When a candidate runs for office from a fixed platform of values and positions, the citizens who disagree with that platform will not be represented if that candidate wins. In a wildly diverse population, having only two very similar platforms to choose from leaves a lot of people with no hope of representation no matter which platform wins.
Since we’ll never move to a parliamentary system where each party is allotted representatives based on the percentage of votes they receive, we need to have more political parties that offer more choices.
Libertarians are on the presidential ballot in many states, but not all of them. They have a specific platform that appeals to about ten percent of voters, but seldom more. Other parties crop up in various state ballots as well, but they represent even fewer voters than the Libertarians.
About every other decade or so, a third-party presidential candidate has risen up and attracted enough of the electorate to have a slim chance of actually winning, but none of those campaigns evolved into a national organization that could break the Democrat/Republican stranglehold on governance.
America has a diverse population with multiple points of view regarding how a citizen-owned government should operate. Having a third or fourth active, viable voice in our national debate might encourage members of the non-voting citizenry to get involved. We might even reach a level where we can claim to be a legitimate democracy.
If nothing else comes from that, at least our elections would be more interesting…
Popular posts from this blog
Most of the time I don't really care who the American president is, and neither should you. It's always been an important job, but its occupant was never meant to be Captain America or Leader Of The Free World. Our president is not supposed to create new policies except in an emergency; the task of setting the national agenda belongs to Congress. Presidential power was originally restricted to running the government and serving as Commander-in-Chief during times of war. Our first president, rest his soul, didn't enjoy his time in office and is probably appalled at how the American people have turned the presidency into a personality-driven media show. George Washington rejected the hero worship shown to him during his days as a living legend, and he warned of the danger that comes from giving too much power and having too much faith in any one person. And that's what we've done. We've surrendered power in a creeping process that started early and has grown steadi…
"Fake News" has become a popular phrase these days. Our president certainly likes to use it, often paired with another common phrase – "mainstream media". Both are convenient but meaningless labels that misrepresent the business of publishing the news in America. The general contempt that a lot of folks have for news media is certainly nothing new. A century ago, newspapers often engaged in what was called 'yellow journalism' and reporters were held in such low esteem that they were referred to as 'ink-stained wretches'. Newspaper publisher William Hearst was the poster boy of Fake News in those days. Hearst and his editors frequently printed misleading or entirely dishonest stories that promoted Hearst's personal views or demonized people he was at odds with. That's completely different from advocacy journalism, which most news sources practice. Some even acknowledge that reality. I was once the editor of the Haleakala Times, a bi-weekly newsp…
By the time you read this, the total debt of the federal government may have reached 20 trillion dollars. Add in all of the estimated state and local government debts and America owes somebody nearly $25 trillion. But that's not enough; Congress is coming back into session in September and will probably raise its self-imposed debt limit in order to borrow some more. They always have before. There's no question who gets the bill for the interest on that debt every year: we all do. Who's paying down that debt? Nobody at all. No president or Congress has lowered the national debt for more than half a century... The cost of nearly 17 years of American military operations in Afghanistan is hard to calculate, but it's more than one trillion dollars. That amount will keep growing every day, because there's no real change coming in our overseas commitments. There's plenty of room to argue over what we're doing in a land long known as the Graveyard of Empires – maybe w…